Disciplina FIS0002 - Modelo Biopsicossocial na Tomada de Decisão Clínica e na Pesquisa em Fisioterapia e Funcionalidade Humana - PPGFisio

Estrutura curricular

Disciplina do PPGFisio
FIS0002 - Modelo Biopsicossocial na Tomada de Decisão Clínica e na Pesquisa em Fisioterapia e Funcionalidade Humana

  • Disciplina obrigatória
  • Início: 05/08/2019
  • Nível: Mestrado
  • Créditos: 3 (Créditos computáveis)
  • Períodos de oferta: 0
    • Ementa
  • Modelo biopsicossocial. Raciocínio clínico e tomada de decisão em fisioterapia de acordo com a Classificação Internacional de Funcionalidade. Análise de métodos e processos vinculados ao desenvolvimento do raciocínio crítico e de tomada de decisão em Fisioterapia. Abordagem centrada no paciente. Hipóteses clínicas e objetivos funcionais. Avaliação fisioterapêutica: uso de instrumentos relacionados aos domínios que permeiam a funcionalidade humana. Construção do raciocínio clínico e tomada de decisão nas diferentes especialidades, tais como Uroginecológica, Ortopédica e traumatológica, Esportiva, Pediátrica, Geriátrica; Oncológica, Fisioterapia Hospitalar; Neurofuncional e em Ergonomia.
    • Bibliografia
  • BIBLIOGRAFIA BÁSICA
    Baker SM, Marshak HH, Rice GT, Zimmerman GJ 2001 Patient participation in physical therapy goal setting. Physical Therapy 81: 1118-1126.

    Cooper BA, Saarinen-Rahikka HK 1986. Interrelationships of theory, clinical models and research. Physiotherapy Canada 38: 97-100.

    Darrah J et al 2006. Role of conceptual models in a physical therapy curriculum: Application of an integrated model of theory, research, and clinical practice. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 22(5):239- 250.

    Davenport TE 2013. Clinical Case Reporting in the Peer-Reviewed Physical Therapy Literature: Time to Move Toward Functioning. Physiotherapy Research International.

    Plack M, Santasier A 2004 Reflective practice: A model for facilitating critical thinking skills within an integrative case study classroom experience. Journal of Physical Therapy Education 18: 5-12.

    Cooper BA, Saarinen-Rahikka HK 1986 Interrelationships of theory, clinical models and research. Physiotherapy Canada 38: 97-100.

    Werner A et al 2002.Use of the ICF model as a clinical problem-solving tool in Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Medicine. Physical Therapy 82(11): 1098-1103.

    BIBLIOGRAFIA COMPLEMENTAR
    • Adler RH. Engel's biopsychosocial model is still relevant today.J Psychosom Res. 2009 Dec;67(6):607-11;

    • Engel, GL. The need of a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science. 1977; 196: 129–136.

    • Jull G. Biopsychosocial model of disease: 40 years on. Which way is the pendulum swinging? Br J Sports Med. 2017 Jan 6. pii: bjsports-2016-097362.

    • Ueda S1, Okawa Y. The subjective dimension of functioning and disability: what is it and what is it for? Disabil Rehabil. 2003 Jun 3-17;25(11-12):596-601.

    • Masala C1, Petretto DR. From disablement to enablement: conceptual models of disability in the 20th century. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(17):1233-44.

    • Leplege A1, Barral C2, Mc Pherson K3. Conceptualizing disability to inform rehabilitation: Historical and epistemological perspectives. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2016 Sep;59S:e59.

    • Lutz BJ1, Bowers BJ. Understanding how disability is defined and conceptualized in the literature. Rehabil Nurs. 2003 May-Jun;28(3):74-8.

    • Beaudry JS. Beyond (Models of) Disability? J Med Philos. 2016 Apr;41(2):210- 28.

    • Bornbaum CC, Doyle PC, Skarakis-Doyle E, Theurer JA. A critical exploration of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework from the perspective of oncology: recommendations for revision. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2013;6:75-86. 4

    • Dutra FC1, Mancini MC2, Neves JA3, Kirkwood RN4, Sampaio RF4,5. Empirical analysis of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) using structural equation modeling. Braz J Phys Ther. 2016 Jun 16;20(5):384-394.

    • Heerkens YF1,2, de Weerd M3, Huber M4, de Brouwer CP5, van der Veen S6, Perenboom RJ3, van Gool CH7, Ten Napel H7, van Bon-Martens M8, Stallinga HA9, van Meeteren NL. Reconsideration of the scheme of the international classification of functioning, disability and health: incentives from the Netherlands for a global debate. Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Jan 27:1-9.

    • Imrie R. Demystifying disability: a review of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Sociol Health Illn. 2004 Apr;26(3):287-305.

    • Lundälv J1,2, Törnbom M3,4, Larsson PO5, Sunnerhagen KS6. Awareness and the arguments for and against the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health among representatives of disability organisations. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Mar 18;12(3):3293-300.

    • OMS - Organização Mundoal da Saúde, CIF: Classificação Internacional de Funcionalidade, Incapacidade e Saúde [Centro Colaborador da Organização Mundial da Saúde para a Família de Classificações Internacionais, org.; coordenação da tradução Cassia Maria Buchalla]. São Paulo: Editora da Universidade de São Paulo - EDUSP; 2003.

    • Schiariti V1, Tatla S2, Sauve K2, O'Donnell M3. Toolbox of multiple-item measures aligning with the ICF Core Sets for children and youth with cerebral palsy. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2017 Mar;21(2):252-263.

    • Tempest S1, Harries P, Kilbride C, De Souza L. To adopt is to adapt: the process of implementing the ICF with an acute stroke multidisciplinary team in England. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(20):1686-94.

    • Tempest S1, McIntyre A. Using the ICF to clarify team roles and demonstrate clinical reasoning in stroke rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2006 May 30;28(10):663-7.